I read an interesting article this morning Jesus the Capitalist .
The article talked about people who used Jesus or the Bible to argue politics. The premise was that people have preconceived idea then go looking for scripture to back it up. To me this is a problem with interpretation of any work. If we read only one sentence from a book or even one book by an author can we truly know their message.
To me context and of an individual verse and in connection with the rest of scripture is the key to understanding.
Jesus should not be used as bludgeon to coerce people in public policy debates. Public policy should be argued only on the basis of weather it is going to provide for a healthier city, state or nation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Jesus should not be used as bludgeon to coerce people in public policy debates.
ReplyDeleteBut if we didn't force our own words in Jesus' mouth, then we might actually have to listen to his own!
Great point. A good example is Matthew 22.15 where the Pharisees attempt to trap Jesus with a question about taxes (give onto Ceasar . . ). I heard homilies that go many different directions when this Gospel reading is used. It also is used by many to further various political arguments.
ReplyDeletePersonally, I think it is a mistake to use scripture to strengthen a weak political argument. One's faith and understanding of scripture may help form their position on an issue, but once you settle on a position you have to be able to argue your position based on our Constitution and laws on the books. It is great if folks read the bible and learn the messages contained there in, but don't bring the bible to the political table (and don't bring politics to church). A good pastor can preach about the issues so the congregation understand the moral implications of issues without seeming to direct or encourage people to vote a particular way. Amen.